Το εύδαιμον το ελεύθερον, το δ’ ελεύθερον το εύψυχον.
– Ευτυχισμένοι είναι οι ελεύθεροι και ελεύθεροι είναι οι γενναίοι. //
// Happy are the free and free are the brave.
Vietnam just made a shocking move closing 86 million bank accounts as the country submits to the OECD’s power grab. What does this mean for the future of Vietnam banks, financial freedom, and the push toward a Vietnam digital ID under Agenda 2045? For expats and investors eyeing Vietnam's economy, the implications are huge. Imagine landing in Saigon only to find your bank access frozen or your visa tangled in new digital ID mandates. We break down the 50-day campaign that's forcing foreigners to submit biometric data, promising convenience but delivering a web of surveillance
In this video, Attorney Ken Duong breaks it all down, the hidden forces behind the OECD, how this impacts ordinary citizens, and what you need to know if you follow Vietnam news closely. show how Project 06, biometric KYC, and the State Bank of Vietnam cross-checks connect to the wider push for a cash-lite society—then compare it with Thailand’s tightening rules for expats and the April 2025 Spain/Portugal blackout that turned payments into chaos. When power dies, a cashless system stops. Are we building fragility into the core?
Stay tuned as Ken shares the legal, economic, and geopolitical angle that mainstream media won’t tell you
GET OUR HELP: https://tinyurl.com/duongglobal00:00 Vietnam's Shocking Bank Account Purge
01:57 Vietnam's Massive Banking Cleanup Operation
03:22 Foreigners, Listen Up! Digital IDs and the Hidden Trap
04:35 Thailand's Chaos: A Warning for Vietnam Expats
05:38 Spain Blackout Nightmare: Digital Fragility Revealed
07:31 WEF Agenda 2045: Vietnam's Surrender?
09:06 Is Vietnam's Digital Push Good or a Total Power Grab?
10:25 How to Resist: Practical Steps Against the Matrix
11:47 Prosperity or Surveillance in Vietnam?
Trailer Epic| Weapon by Alex-Productions
• Cinematic Action Trailer Epic by Alex-Prod...
Music promoted by http://onsound.eu/
Lo-Fi Hip Hop Vlog by Alex-Productions |
• Lo-Fi Hip Hop Vlog by Alex-Productions ( N...
Music promoted by onsound.eu/
►Follow us◄
👉🏻 Become our clients: contact@duongbusinessconsulting.com
👉🏻 Follow Duong Global Business Consulting & International Attorney Ken Duong | / duongbusinessconsulting
👉🏻 Find out how we can help you | http://www.duongbusinessconsulting.com
►About Duong Global Business Consulting Group◄
Duong Global is an international acknowledged worldwide business consulting firm that provides business and legal services specializing in the U.S. – ASEAN multilateral trade relations. Our aim is to enhance corporate competency and performance through result-based solutions, effectively combining processes, people and systems, designed to match clients' individual requirements. Our unique set of business and legal services include International & U.S. Business Law, Immigration Law, Real Estate, Franchising, Marketing, Intellectual Property, and Entertainment.
How this content was made
Auto-dubbed
Audio tracks for some languages were automatically generated. Learn more
An official Black Lives Matter account has defended the suspect in the Charlotte train stabbing that killed Iryna Zarutska, declaring that “oppressed people have a right to violence.”
Iryna Zarutska was tragically killed last week in what authorities are calling an “unprovoked attack” by Decarlos Brown Jr., 34, who had previous arrests and convictions spanning over a decade, and had been released after an arrest in January.
The BLM Instagram post came in response to news reports of the murder and said: “We have a right to violence. All oppressed people have a right to violence. And I’m going to tell you something. It’s like the right to pee. You gotta have the right place, you gotta have the right time, you gotta have the appropriate situation. And I’m absolutely convinced that this is it.”
People are furious. Comparing violence to peeing? Saying oppressed people “have a right to violence”? Critics say it’s completely irresponsible. Framing violence in racial terms will stir even more division.
Law experts say posts like this are dangerous. Even if it’s “just words,” telling millions of followers that violence is okay can have serious consequences. And right now, tensions are already high.
Supporters of BLM try to defend it, saying it’s just about frustration with injustice, not a real call to hurt anyone. But most people aren’t buying it.
“These people are violent dangerous racists” social media influencer Tim Poole said. “It’s not inspiring justice—it’s telling people it’s okay to be violent. That’s messed up,” said an X user in reply.
With no clarification from BLM yet, the post is fueling outrage and debate online. People are asking: when does activism cross the line into recklessness? And is this kind of messaging making things worse instead of better?
Baxter Dmitry is a writer at The People's Voice. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
A detailed explanation of the causes of the Second World War.
This video isn’t sponsored. If you want to support me, here are the best ways to do it:
1) Watch the whole video
2) Share it with a friend
3) Support me on Patreon: / rchapman
If you're interested, I release videos privately on Patreon and through my YouTube membership program. Signing up gives you content more often and supports the channel. The YT program: / @realryanchapman
I'm also starting to put out early, slightly rough main channel releases in both spots, and have a private Discord server linked to both spots.
0:00 Intro
2:17 Wilson's New World
21:09 The Spread of Extremism
29:39 Fascism in Italy
36:53 Hitler Takes Germany
1:00:49 - Japan Takes Manchuria
1:10:20 - Italy Takes Ethiopia
1:19:47 - Germany Breaks the Treaty
1:26:07 - The Symbolism of the Spanish Civil War
1:29:17 - Japanese Militarism Spreads
1:31:43 - Last Steps Before War
1:48:57 - Conclusion
Sources:
Paris 1919 - Margaret MacMillan
A History of Political Theory - George Sabine
The Dark Valley - Piers Brendon
The Road to War - Richard Overy
Appeasement - Tim Bouverie
The Third Reich in Power - Richard Evans
Blood and Power - John Foot
The Rising Sun - John Toland
Adolf Hitler - John Toland
The Coming of the Third Reich - Richard Evans
The Spectre of War - Jonathan Haslam
The Moralist - Patricia O'Toole
The Age of Extremes - Eric Hobsbawm
The Deluge - Adam Tooze
Japan Prepares for Total War - Michael Banhart
Oxford's Fascism Reader - Ed. Roger Griffin
The Origins of the First and Second World Wars - Frank McDonough
The Origins of the Second World War Reconsidered - Ed. Gordon Martel
Europe - Norman Davies
Mein Kampf - Adolf Hitler
Hitler's Second Book - Adolf Hitler
Documents on Nazism - ed. Jeremy Noakes & Geoffrey Pridham
A History of the Twentieth Century - Martin Gilbert
As Aristotle said, “At his best, man is the noblest of all animals; separated from law and justice he is the worst.” Even in Aristotle’s time, humans realized enforcing well-designed laws was critical to the function of any empire. Today, the greatest empire is (arguably) the United States of America, and it happens to have one of the most complicated processes ever for enacting a law. And in the end it leaves people wondering, “Why don’t good laws get passed?”
First, what is the actual process? As a side note, there are many exceptions and minutia to the “basic” process that I won’t discuss for the sake of brevity.
A bill starts as an idea that an interest group wants to pass. The interest group then promotes the bill through activism until they meet a legislator. If they convince the legislator of the bill’s potential, the legislator introduces the bill, and the senate leader refers to the corresponding committee assuming the bill starts in the senate. Bills can start in the house as well, but they undergo a similar process with a few differences. For context, in the Senate, there are various committees that each have a specific purpose and are comprised of a small subset of the Senate.
The committee assigned to the bill is tasked with writing the bill in legal language and then afterward holds a vote. If the bill wins a majority, it is appointed a date to be voted on by the full Senate. If the majority of the Senate supports the bill, then the bill is passed over to the House.
In the House, the bill is also voted on. However, the House’s proponents of the bill often make some changes to the legislature for it to pass, causing different bills to be voted on in the two houses. Occasionally, the bill isn’t modified, but it almost always is.
Assuming the bill is modified, the House sends it to the conference committee, which tries to create a “compromise” bill including elements from the bills passed by the House and Senate. The compromise bill is then sent to the House and Senate, which each vote on it, and if the bill wins in both houses, it is sent to the president.
The president then has ten days to decide whether to pass or veto the bill. Congress can try to override the president’s choice if a bill is rejected, but the hearing requires a supermajority (2/3) to succeed. Yes, even after all this work, it is the president alone who decides the legislature’s fate.
Press enter or click to view image in full size
Of course, I still haven’t explicitly stated why most bills, even good ones, fail. And the truth is, there is no single reason. The problem is the multitude of points of failure for any single bill. Even well-liked bills could be put in a hostile committee, filibustered, vetoed, bribed (I mean lobbied) away, or just about anything else that kills it. The sheer number of steps needed for a bill to become law makes it very unlikely to be enacted. In the end, only 4.5% of bills become laws.
But is such a tight process truly a bad thing? While the founding fathers may not have foreseen filibusters or committees, they intended the process to be complex. On the positive side, most defective bills are quickly and effectively weeded out, while uncontroversial bills, such as thanking groups of veterans, are swiftly passed.
Ultimately, the American system may be confusing, needlessly complicated, and occasionally reject great ideas, but it has proved itself by surviving the test of time.
Το εύδαιμον το ελεύθερον, το δ’ ελεύθερον το εύψυχον.
– Ευτυχισμένοι είναι οι ελεύθεροι και ελεύθεροι είναι οι γενναίοι. //
// Happy are the free and free are the brave.